Trade Cards Online
|
 In the discussion on the
Card "Aragorn, Defender of Rohan"
|
|
legolis
|
I want this card something fierce!!! | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Hobbits"
by
elvenarcher
|
|
admin
|
It's the Lord of the Rings, so you have to love Hobbits! :-) And they do have so many good abilities! Healing, cancelling skirmishes, giving strength to others, etc. etc. This deck seems to use most of those abilities, maybe too many without settling for a single one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "three hunters"
by
heinry
|
|
synthiaj14
|
how did u search the Legolas’ Sword to put in ur deck .. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Legolas’ Sword"
|
|
|
synthiaj14
|
how do u search this card to put it in ur deck | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Easterling"
by
syn14
|
|
godlessmimicry
|
As some advise I'd first post a description of what the deck is trying to achieve, details on your meta, etc. I'd also try strip the draw deck down to 60 cards. For the Shadow side this is easy as Gathering to the Summons is too situational to have 4 copies clogging your hand, so I'd drop that down to only 1-2 copies, which is half the war; just strip a minion or two perhaps. The Freeps side is harder as it is unclear what the strategy is. The single Shadow card seems out of place with everything else being movie blocks, so perhaps that as a start. As an alternative, switch a few cards instead to create a card draw engine. Elves have a few ways of doing this (though I can't recall the name I believe there was a condition that could let you draw 3 cards for some clause). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "kakaka"
by
tentailsbeast
|
|
phlann
|
You forgot this rule: A deck consisting of equal numbers of Free Peoples and Shadow cards, with a minimum of 30 of each (starting included without the ringbearer and the ring). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Hail of arrows"
by
dk42
|
|
|
phlann
|
You forgot this rule: A deck consisting of equal numbers of Free Peoples and Shadow cards, with a minimum of 30 of each (starting included without the ringbearer and the ring). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "LOTR deck"
by
sqwerty6
|
|
|
phlann
|
You forgot this rule: A deck consisting of equal numbers of Free Peoples and Shadow cards, with a minimum of 30 of each (starting included without the ringbearer and the ring). |
|
| Back to top |
Modified on October 31, 2011 02:04 pm |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "32/32 pure FotR deck"
by
parker
|
|
morgul_rat
|
It's been a while since I actually played...I totally forgot about that MERRY!!! I am going to make a new deck soon. Wow, Thanks for the IDEA, hahahaha. | |
| Back to top |
Modified on January 17, 2011 07:27 pm |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Hobbity RB/Morki"
by
filipek632
|
|
pawel_ek1
|
bardzo słabo złożony deck! żadnego pomysłu na gre | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Smeagol/Gollum"
by
filipek632
|
|
|
pawel_ek1
|
ty chyba nigdy nie widziales dobrze zlozonego smeagola i golluma 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Smeagol/Gollum"
by
filipek632
|
|
lee9313
|
beznadziejny deck  zreszta jak wszystkie twoje
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "The Eye is watching..."
by
beyonder
|
|
the_yone
|
Umm...First off, weres the ring? and second...you can't start off with that fellowship...illegal, but w/e | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Harry Potter"
by
theringofrings
|
|
reymysterio
|
i wish i had that card cause i have almost all the cards of harry potter 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Troll Power"
by
apopatos
|
|
corvus4eomer
|
To abalo deck einai afto re? ouuuu!!! | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Little hobbit"
by
cardshop
|
|
cardshop
|
I was assuming that the effect was only applied once per turn. But you are right in that I should state that explicitely. So I have added that to the wording. Thanks a lot. | |
| Back to top |
Modified on March 23, 2007 09:28 pm |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Little hobbit"
by
cardshop
|
|
nbarden
|
Might want to stick a limit on there. Because I can then just keep using his text over and over to make a companion's strength equal to the minions, and then play my pumps. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Pippin/Ranger Wounding (33/33)"
by
carpeguitarrem
|
|
|
nbarden
|
You know, you can add Faramir, Captain of Gondor in the starting fellowship. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Deck Gandalf-Elves/Ringwraith"
by
alucard14
|
|
carpeguitarrem
|
Pretty nice...I love the Gandalf-Forearmed-Sauron combo...genius! But I don't get how you prevent wounds or corruption... | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "three hunters"
by
heinry
|
|
|
carpeguitarrem
|
Recheck your starting fellowship: Thorongil is [4], plus [2] for Legolas. That's [6]. Did you mean Aragorn, Strider? | |
| Back to top |
|
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 Next | ||
