Trade Cards Online
|
 In the discussion on the
Card "Tatooine: Cantina"
|
|
shawnpgorman
|
The image for this card is The light-side version. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Princess Leia Organa"
|
|
whoops
|
PLEASE HELP ME! TO BRING FOR ME THIS CARD!!!! Who has this card. Please contact me. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Princess Leia Organa"
|
|
|
whoops
|
I Search this Card for my set. Make it completed. Can i Buy this one of you??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Princess Leia"
|
|
|
whoops
|
i'm search this card for my collection. Who has this card for me ?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Tawss Khaa"
|
|
emoss
|
This is the wrong image for this card. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "TIE Vanguard Squadron"
by
auzi
|
|
auzi
|
I made a bunch of cards at once and just posted them to get some more cards up. I am looking back on all the cards and fixing errors now. Whenever i change a card and re post it, i never see the new card. So i am not sure if you can see changes, or if it is just my computer that will now show the new card. For this one i forgot to make it limited to 3, maneuver 2, the deployment requirements as well as typos. I wanted to make its ability different so i did not have room for its original text. Thanks for the help. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Hail Fire"
by
auzi
|
|
tristans
|
Great picture! I wonder if the combined ability should be higher if one of the pilots is due to become an officer as officers tend to have ability 2+. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "TIE Vanguard Squadron"
by
auzi
|
|
|
tristans
|
Interesting cards. For continuity you might want to consider including "You may deploy cards to the same system or sector as a 'react'." and you have an asterisk for the deploy cost which should also be referenced, e.g., "Replaces 3 TIE/RCs at one location (TIE/RCs go to Used Pile)." Also the maneuver of the original TIE Vanguard is 2 so giving the squadron maneuver 3 is a bit generous it seems. Typos: [Title] Vanguard [Lore] variant [Game text] Permanent [Game text] starfighter (one word) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "New Hope"
by
auzi
|
|
|
tristans
|
I like it. Not sure about ability -1 for opponent's starships... Probably better to increase the ability required for battle destiny or reduce the battle destinies. Typos: [Lore] Immediately [Lore] Admiral Ackbar [Game text] Opponent's [Game text] adjacent |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Nobody worries about droids."
by
bot_bot
|
|
|
auzi
|
If this is your latest version, it looks good. There are a few combos that work for this deck and since you have been playing it, i am sure this is probably what works the best. If i were to play competitively this is the type of deck i would play. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "The Begining Of The End"
by
auzi
|
|
|
auzi
|
Yes that is the intent. I wanted the card to be duel purpose to where you could use it in a normal dueling deck, but when used with the objective can be placed directly on table. This is also supposed to be the big advantage to the objective, having this effect down from the start of game, as well as having no deployment restrictions for your jedi. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Hawk-bat 1"
by
bot_bot
|
|
bot_bot
|
hmmm, true i think your right, its been a few years since ive read them 2 | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Hawk-bat 1"
by
bot_bot
|
|
bginysta
|
It has been awhile since I've read the X wing series, however from what I remember Kettch (Wedge) wouldn't have been in Hawkbat 1 that would have been the call sign of Face's TIE not Wedge's. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Strength in Numbers"
by
auzi
|
|
|
auzi
|
I would like to keep it general when referring to non unique aliens so that operative decks, tatooine decks and other types of non unique alien decks may benefit also. Since it is a jabba's palace themed card i figured giving one advantage to using a jabba's place aliens and locations would make sense. I do like the idea of putting the aliens on the effect directly since that would help in getting non unique aliens out quicker as well as make the effect that much more useful. thanks for the comment. | |
| Back to top |
Modified on January 17, 2012 10:09 am |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Hoth (LS, old style, Level 1)"
by
flensburger
|
|
|
bot_bot
|
Great deck. I like battling it out on hoth. Me and the mates always go back to the "old style" decks, lot more fun, its almost like your battling like the movie, that sounded a bit nerdy. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "General Windu"
by
bginysta
|
|
|
bot_bot
|
Was Windu a pilot at all? Ive read a few books and comics and never seen him flying. Windu is a very powerful jedi. He should be "immune to attrition". You got to change the lightsaber destiny thing, I also think it should be more if Windu drawers it as he was the most powerful dulest. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Count Dooku"
by
bginysta
|
|
|
bot_bot
|
Should just have +2 to dark side lightsaber drawers. Low ability dosn't bother me, just helps show that he was a puppet. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "<>Asteroid Base"
by
tristans
|
|
|
bot_bot
|
might be nice if you could deploy a ion cannon onto it. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Strength in Numbers"
by
auzi
|
|
|
bot_bot
|
I think the card should have "deploy this card with 10 Jabba's aliens(or weapons,or interupts,etc....), and may use cards from here as if from your hand."??? or pick a card from here instead of drawering force? | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Executor"
|
|
admin
|
What are the right values for Forfeit and Deploy? 15 and 15? | |
| Back to top |
|
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ...>> Next | ||
