Trade Cards Online
| Pages: Previous 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ...>> Next | ||
|
 In the discussion on the
Deck "angelic featherjavascript:emot"
by
grimmreaper92
|
|
diaochan21
|
ur deck has too much triggers, it has over 20 triggers | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Elite Warden S-Hackles"
by
crazeduncle
|
|
crazeduncle
|
Thank you for pointing that out. It was supposed to be 'until end of turn' and has been corrected. As for the effect not being like the rest, that is sort of the point. Most of the others are team players while the Warden is the guard of those they take down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Descendant of the Apocalypse"
by
toshikikaii
|
|
dionysius88
|
the tcg format is only english cards and descendant is not released yet in english so it doesn't exist in tcg so not legal and you clearly don't know what you are talking about | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Raz'gok, Time Beast."
by
crazeduncle
|
|
vayupurana
|
that effect is too powerful, it would be best if it was for vg only and being LB5 as that can ruin your opponent too greatly notice how stil vampir's megablast does the same but its only for that turn |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Elite Warden S-Hackles"
by
crazeduncle
|
|
|
vayupurana
|
its odd you only need to get rid its restraint one for it to be gone forever, and the LB4 would just make it seem like not to use other elite cards with it | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Descendant of the Apocalypse"
by
toshikikaii
|
|
toshikikaii
|
Descendant is legal in the TCG format though, the OCG format is the format in which it is illegal. So, my point is completely valid. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Descendant of the Apocalypse"
by
toshikikaii
|
|
lunetiz
|
Well considering that this is a TCG rather than OCG format.. I would say that this deck is awesome... retire opponents rear guards, but more importantly, speeding up the process where you could ride to a grade 3 probably before your opponent goes for a grade 2. Way too aggressive and that's why they limit the main cards down... the only problem is that you seem to be limiting yourself down to just eradicators, which is good since most of their effects would revolve around whether the number of "Eradicators" are meet or if you have a Vanguard with "Eradicator in it's name, the effect(s) will apply, but you restrict yourself from doing other things that would help out... you know provide a second option for your strategy so that way your opponent won't see your moves coming... or at least that's my opinion, but whatever might feel your flow... I notice that the ones that have the most straight forward approach tend to need the most protection when their attacks fail and end up losing the match because of it (perfect guard or no perfect guard) | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Descendant of the Apocalypse"
by
toshikikaii
|
|
|
dionysius88
|
but descendant is not in the tcg so your point is invalid | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Vermillion"
by
toshiki2
|
|
drash
|
You dont need hisen trade him for a perfect guard and use only 2 or 3 different grade 3s so that u have a chance of getting vermillion or The Blood in hand | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Lightning Hell"
by
drash
|
|
toshiki2
|
i say the deck you built is a strong deck but is that gauntlet blaster dragon your ace | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "MLB Style"
by
frostmournez
|
|
cygnusword
|
MLB now only can have 2 in decks should change your deck now | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Nova G BD (isaac_good"
by
isaac_good
|
|
frostside
|
GG  lets fight again next time
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Prophecy Celestial, Ramiel"
|
|
junwei99
|
Quite a good card for Angel Feather | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Great Armor Break Dragon!~"
by
jfdv99
|
|
crazwater
|
You should really use thunderboom instead, as you have spark rain and demoliton dragon | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "fearsome ninja beasts"
by
niladri96
|
|
connerx
|
i think the defense of this deck is amazing | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Battle Sisters Clan"
by
aaronrob23
|
|
aaronrob23
|
If you rate this deck lower than 4 give me a reason, so I can improve on this Battle Sister deck. Thanks.  (No negative comments please, or ratings).
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Little Fighter, Cron"
|
|
predator01
|
says grade 0 but for some reason the grade/skill is for grade 1 messin with my searches |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Demonic Dragon Berserker, Vasuki"
|
|
|
predator01
|
AUTO](RC): When your grade 3 «Narukami» is placed on (VC), this unit gets [Power]+10000 until the end of turn | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Rumble Gun Dragon"
|
|
|
predator01
|
AUTO](VC):When this unit's drive check reveals a grade 3 «Narukami», choose one opponent's grade 1 or less rear-guards, and retire it. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Card "Eradicator, Spark Horn Dragon"
|
|
|
predator01
|
[AUTO](VC) Limit Break 4 (This ability is active if you have four or more damage):When this unit attacks a vanguard, this unit gets [Power]+5000 until end of that battle. [AUTO](VC):[Counter Blast (1) - Cards with "Eradicator" in its card name] When this unit's attack hits a vanguard, you may pay the cost. If you do, your opponent chooses one of his or her rear-guards, and retires it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Pages: Previous 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ...>> Next | ||
