merit points,
left for next level.

[sign up] / [login] The Buzz... by skittlz100 TIP Browse your collector binders online! You can see your collection graphically as if you had your binders on the web, and you can sort them in different ways. latest comments by skittlz100 Showing comments on all sections Cards Card Reviews Dream Cards Decks for all games A Game of ThronesAndroid NetrunnerArknaBattle Spirits TCGBella SaraCall of Cthulhu, the Card GameCardfight!! VanguardCosplay DeviantsDuel MastersEnadryaFinal Fantasy TCGInfernoKaijudo TCGLegend of the Five RingsLord of the Rings, the Card GameMagic: The GatheringMitos y LeyendasMonsunoMy Little Pony Trading CardsNarutoPokemonPower Rangers Action Card GameStar Wars - The Card GameUFS (Universal Fighting System)Vampire: The Eternal StruggleWarhammer InvasionWeiss Schwarz CCGWorld of Warcraft TCGYuGiOh!Z/X - Zillions of Enemy X-----.hack//ENEMY7th SeaAliens Predator CCGAnachronismAni-MayhemAvatar: The Last Airbender TCGBabylon 5Battlestar Galactica CCGBattletech CCGBen 10 Alien Force TCGBeyBlade TCGBleach TCGBlue Dragon RPCGBuffy The Vampire SlayerCardcaptors CCGChaotic TCGClone Wars AdventuresConan CCGDeadlands DoomtownDigimon CCGDigimon D-Tector Card GameDigimon Digi-battleDoctor Who - Battles in TimeDragon Ball ZDragonball CCGEl Mundo de Aguila RojaEredan iTCGEVE: The Second Genesis CCGFénix, Juego de Cartas de EstrategiaFight KlubFullmetal Alchemist TCGHarry PotterHecatomb TCGHigh Stakes DrifterHorus HeresyHumanKindIlluminati: New World OrderInitial DInuYashaJedi KnightsKingdom Hearts TCGKnights of the Zodiac CCGLooney Tunes TCGLord Of The RingsMagi-Nation DuelMaple Story iTCGMegaMan TCGMiddle EarthMythosNeopetsNetrunnerOverPowerPower Rangers CCGRedakai - Conquer the KairuSailor Moon CCGShadowfistStar TrekStar Trek - The Card GameStar WarsStar Wars TCGStargate TCGTeen TitansThe Eye of JudgmentThe War (Russian game)The X-Files CCGVs. System (Marvel & DC)WarCryWarhammer 40,000 CCGWarlordWars TCGWizards of MickeyWWF/WWE Raw DealXena: Warrior Princess CCGYoung JediYu Yu HakushoZatch Bell! The Card Battle In the discussion on the Dream Card "Purple Quasar" by gareon skittlz100 Change to where you have to choose your opponents monsters to send, that'd be a nice touch :3 Back to top Posted: April 21, 2013 10:46 pm   In the discussion on the Dream Card "Dark Blader of Chaos" by yodafan07 skittlz100 Make it just Magician of Black Chaos, not or Dark Magician of Chaos, DMagician is already OP, people should have to go out of their way to play this card. And no polymerization required? Definitely fix that. Definitely. Back to top Posted: April 21, 2013 10:44 pm Modified on April 21, 2013 10:45 pm   In the discussion on the Dream Card "Messi Master of The Six Samurai's" by aaronrose22 skittlz100 Lower it's attack a little bit, change it's name so it doesn't include "Six Samurai" in the name, change the lore to make it only possible to control one at a time, and change the level to 7. Reasons: Six Sam's aren't meant to have high attack Having "Six Samurai" in the name makes it incredibly cheap with gateway/united/dojo. More than one would be incredibly incredibly cheap 7 opens up for xyz plays with shien, if the opportunity arose Back to top Posted: April 21, 2013 10:36 pm   In the discussion on the Dream Card "overfishing mother grizzly" by stevil skittlz100 Definitely limit to once per turn, and/or has to be face up attack position only. Incredibly op, no offense or anything, just critiquing. Once that's fixed however, nice card. I'll change my vote if/when it's changed Back to top Posted: April 21, 2013 10:29 pm   In the discussion on the Dream Card "mermail dragon" by dagon45 skittlz100 1 Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner monsters When this card is Synchro Summoned, all "Mermail" monsters you control gain 300 ATK. You can Tribute 1 "Mermail" monster you control to activate 1 of these effects. Destroy 1 Spell or Trap card on the field. Look at your opponents hand; select 1 card from your opponent's hand and discard it. Use a text like that or something, just to make it easier to read and more up to date. Now, onto my comments... It's far too broken. There's no limit to the amount of times you can use it's effects, comes out as a 3000, gives a boost to other mermails, and if you use it's effect, you'll be using your mermail monster effects that you tributed as well more than likely too, so it's plusses all around for you. I would recommend something more like this: 1 WATER Tuner + 1 or more non-Tuner "Mermail" monsters When this card is Synchro Summoned, all "Mermail" monsters you control gain 300 ATK. Once per turn, you can Tribute 1 "Mermail" monster you control to activate 1 of these effects. Destroy 1 Spell or Trap card on the field. Select 1 random card from your opponent's hand and discard it. If you discard a card with this effect, you can discard 1 more random card from your opponent's hand in a row by Tributing 1 "Mermail" monster you control. This card cannot attack the turn you activate this effect. Back to top Posted: March 2, 2013 01:49 am   In the discussion on the Dream Card "Number 88: Gimmick Puppet - Destiny Leo" by hackingace97 skittlz100 Lol why would he make this a dream card? It's already a real card. xD Back to top Posted: March 2, 2013 01:07 am   In the discussion on the Card Review for "Maxx "C"" by westyytsew skittlz100 Here are a couple more cons: 1. Maxx "C" cannot save your life, only hope it shuts your opponent down because they're afraid of what you might draw. If the deck you're facing special summons out enough monsters to make "C" really useful, chances are you're going up against an OTK. That's why it's important to use some of the special summon from the hand cards, like Gorz, Fader, Swift Scarecrow, and/or Trag. 2. This card CAN cause a deck out in the end. If you face Madolche or X-Sabers (two somewhat popular decks) they can and will abuse Maxx "C". Madolche with Desperate Tag will just keep on special summoning in the battle phase, which the normal OTK usually uses Madolche Waltz as well. X-Sabers can preform the Faultroll loop, and not only make you draw every card in your deck, but make you discard each one as well! This can be prevent only by cards like Effect Veiler and D.D. Crow. Back to top Posted: December 29, 2012 03:40 am   In the discussion on the Card Review for "All-Out Attacks" by teranz0 skittlz100 quote from teranz0: quote from skittlz100: white_night's combos don't make much sense for the deck..if you creature swap a tomato, it goes to your graveyard, so your opponent doesn't get to special summon... Voltic has nothing to do with all out attacks. He creates his own OTK loop. Very intrigued by this, I think I'm gonna try it out, nice review! For Infernal Incinerator though, could that be replaced with any monster with 2700+ attack? Also, would Photon Sanctuary be a good card for these decks? If I'm assuming right, they would be special summoned in attack, and must attack for 2000 each, sounds nice to me! One more thing, why would the loop end with the Morphing Jar #2 combo? You say All-Out Attacks is destroyed...Why is that? Thank you for your comment, it means a lot! Infernal Incininerator can be replaced with any monster with 2700+ attack, especially now, with monsters with large attacks entering the field so easily. To be honest, I prefer Stone Statue to this, but it works either way. Photon sanctuary has one issue: it special summons in defense, so you'd have to wait a turn to change position. It would be better to use something like Metal-Reflect Slime, if you want to stick to s/t-monsters, because it special summons into the position of your choice The loop ends for the Morphing Jar #2 combo, because Yugioh has rules against yield-less infinite loops. If the infinite loop ceases to accomplish anything, the card that is keeping it going is destroyed. But this only happens after nothing is accomplished anymore. So let's say that you only have 3 monsters in the deck- 2 m-jar#2 and a needle worm, and you flip m-jar #2 with 2 monsters on you side of the field. This loop will continue until you ONLY HAVE THOSE MONSTERS LEFT IN YOUR DECK AND NEEDLE WORM HAS COMPLETELY MILLED OUT YOUR OPPONENT. At that point, the loop will not change anything. So then, All-Out Attacks is destroyed, you end your turn, and you win because your opponent has no deck. Makes sense to me! Great review! Well except the Sanctuary. Wouldn't All-Out Attacks switch them to attack? Or does it not work for tokens or something? Back to top Posted: December 29, 2012 03:33 am   In the discussion on the Card Review for "Soul Taker" by prosaic skittlz100 quote from buddhaisrebel: Great review bro, I think you missed one very important thing (sorry if you didnt). Soul taker makes cards like E-hero the shining and Lightpulsar miss the timing, because of the boost to LP. That's the main reason i side this card. Great review otherwise though This was made in 2008, so it's to be expected. People just recently started siding and maining Soul Taker for those reasons, with the rise of HERO and Chaos Dragons due to the new Structure deck and Rescue Rabbit. Back to top Posted: December 29, 2012 03:29 am   In the discussion on the Dream Card "Pandora, the beast of destruction" by richralf skittlz100 Well that's not very fair... Don't you think? Maybe if he had idk, 1000 atk or something, but not 5000 destroy all cards on the field and he can attack twice. The summoning requirements are pretty easy as well, considering you just need one monster in your hand as a minimum. Back to top Posted: December 23, 2012 12:15 pm   In the discussion on the Card Review for "All-Out Attacks" by teranz0 skittlz100 white_night's combos don't make much sense for the deck..if you creature swap a tomato, it goes to your graveyard, so your opponent doesn't get to special summon... Voltic has nothing to do with all out attacks. He creates his own OTK loop. Very intrigued by this, I think I'm gonna try it out, nice review! For Infernal Incinerator though, could that be replaced with any monster with 2700+ attack? Also, would Photon Sanctuary be a good card for these decks? If I'm assuming right, they would be special summoned in attack, and must attack for 2000 each, sounds nice to me! One more thing, why would the loop end with the Morphing Jar #2 combo? You say All-Out Attacks is destroyed...Why is that? Back to top Posted: December 4, 2012 02:00 pm Modified on December 5, 2012 04:48 pm   In the discussion on the Card Review for "Alexandrite Dragon" by killingdragon skittlz100 Not all too informative bud. Name some combos, like Rescue Rabbit, Galaxy-Eyes Photon Dragon, Honest, there's a whole bunch of stuff out there for this card. Back to top Posted: December 4, 2012 01:38 pm   In the discussion on the Dream Card "Savior of the Skies" by taem skittlz100 Once you get that thing on the field though, it would be impossible to remove, unless flipped face down. I think you should have a cost, like discarding a card, or banishing a type-specific card from your graveyard. Or even "If you target this card, it cannot attack your opponent directly." EDIT: Actually, I don't think it should be once while on the field.. that almost makes it too weak, ya know? I'm not trying to sound criticizing, just throwing out suggestions. Back to top Posted: December 3, 2012 09:38 am Modified on December 22, 2012 05:52 am   In the discussion on the Dream Card "Pot of Vengeance" by skittlz100 skittlz100 quote from shinobi_phoenix: "Remove from play" as a phrase is now "banish" and any variants of it due to time-sensitive tenses as per the English language (banished, banishing, banishes). http://www.konami.com/yugioh/articles/?p=2915 It has been this way officially per Konami THEMSELVES since May... of LAST YEAR as in it's been this way for over a solid full year. I question if people on this site actually play the game and keep up on the rules and changes. quote from taem: The card was created on December of 2010, before the phrase was removed. This thread has been inactive for over a year. Thank you. And I will change that now, never really paid much attention to the Dream Cards. Back to top Posted: September 18, 2012 02:40 pm   In the discussion on the Deck "Cyber Dragon OTK." by skittlz100 skittlz100 The monsters are only to stall, draw, and bring out Cyber Twin. Back to top Posted: June 3, 2012 01:22 pm   In the discussion on the Deck "Red Nova!" by skittlz100 skittlz100 @first comment I don't need Xyz, they'd waste space in my extra deck. I can summon basically everything in there in one duel. I've summoned all but three before. There just is no card to take out for any xyz. Good thought though! and second vote: Why 3? ...I guess it's okay, but at least give some feedback, come on now. This deck gets a 6500 beatstick that can't be destroyed by card effects out EVERY duel! I think it deserves some more credit. Back to top Posted: April 27, 2012 10:23 am   In the discussion on the Deck "power 2" by djcard skittlz100 United We Stand and Mage power are the two best equips, I'd use those instead of Axe of Despair and Ballista and all...just saying. Monster Reborn is a staple spell that belongs in every deck. Other traps like Torrential Tribute, Dimensional Prison, even Compulsory would do nice as well. Fiendish Chain > Shadow Spell. Draining Shield > Enchanted Javelin (Enchanted Javelin doesn't negate the attack). Dark Hole > Lightning Vortex and Tribute to the Doomed. Poison Mummy, Drillago, Masked Beast, and Rapid-Fire could be replaced... No real point to having them. If you insist on a Ritual monster (which I recommend against) Garlandolf King of Destruction and Demise, King of Armageddon would do much better than Masked Beast. And since you can't use Solidarity in this beatdown deck because of the various types of monsters, I'd recommend Burden of the Mighty. If your opponent summons a strong monster, that might be a tough obstacle to get around. Back to top Posted: April 27, 2012 04:01 am   In the discussion on the Card Review for "XX-Saber Darksoul" by jose_t96 skittlz100 Forget this post. You have good sportsmanship at least...I'm being selfish. sorry. Back to top Posted: June 4, 2011 07:43 am Modified on June 5, 2011 07:04 am   In the discussion on the Card Review for "Dragunity Dux" by skittlz100 skittlz100 Couple things about the ratings... If you give ANY rating, please give reasoning. Guidelines are like this: 5 : Review is near flawless. Say why it was good/what you liked about it. 4 : Well, there's gotta be something wrong with it, otherwise you woulda gave a 5. Please tell what that something is. 3 : The good and the bad balance out. It's not good, but it's by no means bad either. 2 : It's faulty, missing information, and doesn't explain like it should. 1 : Just all around terrible, wasn't helpful in any way. I'd just like to add that in there, because people keep saying it's such a great review, then giving me a four. If it's so great...then wouldn't it deserve better than that? Thinking out loud I guess. Oh and btw, if you can't comment in English, then obviously you can't read the review that is ALSO in English. Not trying to sound greedy, but it's like, impossible to win with all these fours coming in. Back to top Posted: May 30, 2011 05:35 am   In the discussion on the Deck "jaden yuki-elements heart(RAW)" by li23yut skittlz100 Future Fusion is limited to 1, and Instant Fusion is kinda pointless in your deck... It only has 1 target, which is Mariner, and there's no point in bringing him out with Instant Fusion... Just constructive criticism, good luck! Back to top Posted: May 23, 2011 07:03 pm   Page 1 of 6 Pages: [1]  2  3  4  5  6   Next search for a card | cards you have | cards you want | look for trades your messages | references | card reviews | dream cards | forums affiliates | links | advertise with us | help [Total time spent: 0.2363] [Total queries executed: 66 in 0.1696 seconds]

2002-2013 © TradeCardsOnline.com All rights reserved. Contact us here. [Web development by Clemente Zamora.] Spanish version at CambiaCartas.com
The information presented on this site about games and collectible cards, both literal and graphical, are copyright by their respective copyright owners (Konami, Decipher Inc., Wizards of the Coast Inc., etc.). This web is not produced, endorsed, supported, or affiliated with any of the copyright owners.