The Buzz... by ankit at Trade Cards Online

The Buzz... by ankit

latest comments by ankit

Showing comments on for

In the discussion on the Deck "Let's see:>" by rubic

ankit

This deck lacks a lot of draw, it's unbalanced as it is right now. The choice of Psychics is good, but it could be better. Also, you have a lot of self-destroying spells, which don't go in this deck as well. Raiden Hole is over-rated, it doesn't do too great of a job. Add water, basically. Cebu Aquman, Aquan Jr.'s Delivery, Energy Stream, etc. Also, add a bit of defense in the form of Ninja Strike, for example, Falconer and Orochi/Hanzou. Running Bega at 1 isn't worth it, add Queen Alcadeias instead.

Posted: January 16, 2013 06:10 am
Modified on January 16, 2013 06:13 am

In the discussion on the Deck "NobodysPerfect" by ggergoke98

ankit

Hmm.. well, there are a few cards that you could change.
First off, replaced Terror Pit by Death Gate. Second, replace Energy Stream by Aquan Jr. Then, remove Aqua Slash, Immortal Braid, Raiden Hole and Energy Hole. Use cards like Emperor Hole, Dravita Hole, Cebu Aquman Jr., Dismantle Jenny, etc. Control decks tend to control hand and BZ, while gaining cards in their hand.

Posted: October 9, 2012 05:44 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Sky Dragon's Roar!" by ankit

ankit

Thanks, but this is just a test deck. I haven't perfected it to my liking yet, these are just some random DMR-05 cards put together. I'll run a few test duels with this deck and make changes accordingly.

Posted: July 7, 2012 05:30 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Realm Of The Dragons!" by ankit

ankit

quote from supersaiyan2:

You can add valkerious dragon because most of the times you will have more than 2 dragons in battlezone. Add bolmeteus samurai dragon if you want to combo with yamato .

Well yes, Valkerious Dragon is a thought indeed. But I have tried Bolmeteus Samurai Dragon with Yamato before, didn't quite work for me, but oh well. Also, it's a mono-fire dragon deck, so yes, it is very dependent on Cocco Lupias. It lacks speed as well. But thanks for your suggestion. :-)

Posted: May 7, 2012 06:32 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Dragon Monarch" by ankit

ankit

quote from rks_blitzer:

The mono-civ requirement for a Monarch deck is pretty ridiculous. Anyways...

The deck should be focused only on holding off the opponent until it can get out its Monarch, and win with it. Basically, you want a mono-Fire control deck.

Get rid of Genji XX, Pildol, Boleas, and Dual Stinger, as they're assault-based cards and don't have a place here. You might think they serve as more useful evo baits for Drag Moon, but Jack Raidou makes them less useful. Yagyuu is just a combo card to boost a large field of Dragons, and doesn't really help much either.

Max out Jack Raidou, Drag Moon, and Cocco.

Fire chargers, especially Volcano Charger, can really help you boost your mana along with the Fire Birds. Game On! Charger lets you kill a creature, and combos great with Sunburst NEX. Stagrandu can smash your opponent's large creatures, and helps you control the field. And Velyrika Dragon needs to go in here somewhere, I think...

And how's Genji Aini working out for you?

First off, I haven't yet used Genji Aini's effect in a duel. But I believe it should be useful, as it would have helped me in my test duel if I had some useful cards in hand.

I sure can do without Genji XX and Dual Stinger, those were merely fillers anyways. But, Pildol & Boleas are cheap evo baits, the main purpose of these are so that I can evolve Drag Moon in one turn. Though i'll replace them if they are not useful in my further duels.

Yeah, i'll max out Cocco and jack Raidou. Maybe 3 for Drag Moon.

Chargers, eh? Yeah, I can give them a try. I didn't think of those before.

About Stagrandu and Velyrika Dragon, hm. Not sure. I'll see to them.

And lastly, thanks for checking it out.

P.S. I know you hate mono-fire dragons.

Posted: February 27, 2012 02:20 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Munde Ke Gunde! (-_-)" by thecoolyash

ankit

Hmm, after two cards that Parin mentioned, here's another one. Slash Charger is not restricted to 1, it's banned. Meaning, you can't even have a single copy of the card.

Also, since you forget the ban/restrict list, here's something that should help.

http://duelmasters.wikia.com/wiki/Hall_of_Fame

Posted: January 27, 2012 02:39 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Radiance Of The Sun!" by ankit

ankit

quote from rks_blitzer:

With a Mad Romanoff deck, your mana levels don't need to go very high, so remove Romanesk. No need for Bolshack NEX, Stardust NEX, or Poppi Luck in here, and Spell Del Fin is too expensive.

Take out the Faerie Lives for Dreaming Moon Knife, Yattar Wan, Poisonous Mushroom, or a combination of them (they're the same thing in different races, anyways). Max out Shooting Hole, as Shooting Gaial is too awesome to not be run at 4, especially with Mad.

Thanks for the comment.

And, some things I wanna point out. Stardust NEX is present only to help Bolshack Dragon awaken into Bolshack Mobius, and to some extent, Sunburst NEX. Spell Del Fin is expensive, agreed, and so is Eternal Meteor Kaiser. Romanesk is included for plan B, if Mad Romanoff doesn't work. Because with Romanesk, Spell Del Fin and Eternal Meteor Kaiser are easy summonings. Poppi Luck is basically to protect my Psychic Dragons.

Also, yes, I was thinking of maxing out Shooting Hole. I'll run a few more duels and then change accordingly. Thanks for your time though, appreciate it.

Posted: December 4, 2011 12:17 pm

In the discussion on the Deck "Crossed Darkness!" by ankit

ankit

Jollycheong and Justincheong, I don't need advice from someone who doesn't even know what Psychics are. Jollycheong, I have nothing against you. You at least play fair, but not Justincheong. To be honest, he's just a n o o b, with no respect for others whatsoever. Oh, and a blunt liar as well.

Anyways, please, I advice you people to learn how to play properly before you start commenting on other people's deck. It just makes you look bad.

Posted: November 22, 2011 12:12 am
Modified on November 22, 2011 12:14 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Crossed Darkness!" by ankit

ankit

quote from rks_blitzer:

You really don't need the 3 Fly Labs and 4 Faerie Life. Remove them from the deck and add in 1 Mil Armor, 1 Prince Avaraldo, 1 Dravita Hole, 3 Shiny Holes, and 1 Rose Castle. As for psychics, remove a psychic Ganveet for Chakra.

Yep, exactly what I wanted to hear lol. :3
Never intended to use nature in the first place.

Posted: November 21, 2011 08:31 pm

In the discussion on the Deck "Ankit, The Dragon Lord" by ankit

ankit

Blitzer, forget I ever said anything to you. I don't like to argue about something that is based on opinions. You have yours, I have mine. You have a different style of dueling than I do, lets leave it at that.

Posted: October 31, 2011 08:30 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Ankit, The Dragon Lord" by ankit

ankit

quote from rks_blitzer:

Read this before reading the rest of the comment: http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=5336232

quote from ankit:

Wow, I don't understand your point here. You voted it a 2 because you don't like dragons?

Well, voting it a 2 is silly, but Dragons are unlikable. They are rather overused.

quote from ankit:

*sigh* You sure are something else. I checked everyone else's deck, your reasons.. They are outright absurd.

Not outright absurd. Not a reason to vote against a deck with, but not completely ridiculous.

quote from ankit:

It does seem like the only things you are good at, is running your mouth and playing with banned cards.

He doesn't play with banned cards, look at his decks.

quote from ankit:

I don't mind the banned cards part, I don't really care whether you do or not, honestly speaking, I doubt you can beat any one of us using your strongest banned cards.

With the optimal hybrid deck, yes, he can. They are banned for a reason.

quote from ankit:

Anyhow, dude, please get a life.

Just because he is against you means he has no life? The "no life" argument is stupid and irrelevant.

quote from ankit:

Just because your decks are no good,

Actually, they are quite good.

quote from ankit:

doesn't mean you go on a rampage and tell everyone else that there's isn't.

Well, this deck is not optimal.

Well, I know some of my comments didn't make sense, but still, what you do and say, is.. Annoying. Why do you always have to assume that you are right? I mean, seriously, why do you have to be so annoying? I understand that you don't like me, neither my decks. But so what? You don't see me voting and leaving comments on anyone else's decks just cause I don't like them, or the decks. I keep it to myself. But your just like, I don't like it, I have to tell it to him. When will you realize that your negative comments don't really matter to us? Just cause you don't like the decks or decks that are build on something that doesn't suit you, it's bad? Amazing how people can be so weird.

Posted: October 31, 2011 04:44 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Ankit, The Dragon Lord" by ankit

ankit

Wow, I don't understand your point here. You voted it a 2 because you don't like dragons? *sigh* You sure are something else. I checked everyone else's deck, your reasons.. They are outright absurd.

It does seem like the only things you are good at, is running your mouth and playing with banned cards. I don't mind the banned cards part, I don't really care whether you do or not, honestly speaking, I doubt you can beat any one of us using your strongest banned cards.

Anyhow, dude, please get a life. Just because your decks are no good, doesn't mean you go on a rampage and tell everyone else that there's isn't.

Posted: October 19, 2011 04:27 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Nexus Chronicles" by ankit

ankit

quote from waileukwu:

the beauty of this deck is that it can reach cards like Romanoff Kaiser in 5 turns. Genji Aini, Pidol, Romanoff Kaiser, Rising NEX all in one father of all ownage decks!

The spells are also extremely complimentary. People just don't use chain death match these days, what a shame.

Yeah, this is a total ownage deck. Though, I have never really pulled out Kaiser in 5 turns, what a shame. Though, did it a few times in 6.

Chain Deathmatch, awesome card to have if your opponents have heavy hitters!

Any one of them slayer would be neat. ;)

Posted: September 11, 2011 10:52 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Realm Of The Dragons!" by ankit

ankit

quote from waileukwu:

hm, if I was to say which decks are the paradigms of dragon decks that i have seen in TCO across the year (and a half) I have been here, I would say Fulki's Heart of Fire (or something like that), Xwass's Light and Fire (or something like that, and this one. They had demonstrated what "dragon decks" should be like, and had changed as dm sets came set by set.

Nice dragon deck. Wait, I mean perfect dragon deck. Very mean, very simple, very deadly.

Fulki was the guy who inspired me to use dragons. I love them now. Xwass's deck is very good too.

And thanks again.

Posted: September 11, 2011 10:45 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Boundary Of Life And Death" by ankit

ankit

quote from waileukwu:

necrodragon and armored dragons had always been great together. Just feel like Arcadias Egg a bit wasted since it is a knight spell that can summon nero gryphis...oh well. Works wonderfully.

Dragons rule.

Yeah, but then again, I do need ST back-ups.

Believe me, this deck was my strongest deck when Heavy wasn't restricted.

The combo of Babelginus, Heavy and dark lupia were awesome. Lost very few duels with this deck.

Posted: September 11, 2011 10:35 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Flaming Wings Of Angels" by ankit

ankit

quote from waileukwu:

not many realize that swordflash champ is one card that will make your life truly miserable if your opponent summoned it over two 'dragon/angel command'. Truly, it will be devestating.

Yeah, and lucky me, I got to do that thrice already! Asylum is one heck of a card choice for this deck. Evolve 2 of those and your all set to devastate your opponent. Don't evolve, no worries, it's abilities still are pretty darn good.

Posted: September 11, 2011 10:30 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Death Under A Rainbow" by ankit

ankit

quote from waileukwu:

Love Kirin, Love UGU, and yes nice rainbow deck. For the win

Love all those one attack win creatures!

And ty!

Posted: September 11, 2011 10:25 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Demon Of Annihilation Awakens" by ankit

ankit

quote from waileukwu:

as long as diablost is out in the battlezone, it will destroy people. That's the weakness though, kill diablost, game over? Hm, but the other spells and creatures are perfect. Lost soul, ouch!

Yeah, pretty much. Even so, it just flips over, isn't destroyed and I can re-awaken him using soul annihilation. Lost soul is pretty useful indeed.

Posted: September 11, 2011 10:19 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Boundary Of Life And Death" by ankit

ankit

quote from parin:

now the deck looks good....

Yeah, thanks. It's working quite well too. Well, for the most part anyways!

Posted: September 2, 2011 11:23 am

In the discussion on the Deck "Boundary Of Life And Death" by ankit

ankit

quote from parin:

since u were not there frm last 8 months ...u need modify this deck ....add genji remove heavy god [to one]also by using cherring pippi u can reduce cost of dragons.... and mny more...

Yeah, already did some changes, gonna test it out soon and make more changes, if needed. Ty for the suggestions.

Posted: September 2, 2011 05:07 am

Page 1 of 2

Pages: [1] 2 Next

Trade Cards Online

The safest place to trade, buy, and sell cards

The Buzz... by ankit