|
In the discussion on the
Deck "master of disaster"
by
victorious1
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
This is Kaijudo not Duel Masters. The rules are different. Learn them and remake your deck. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Dream Card "Super Dimensional Robo DaiGurren"
by
jcthundar
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
[AUTO](VC): when your Dimensional Police units attack, randomly select 2 cards in your opponent's hand and bind them until the close step of that unit's battle. Each time 1 of your DP units attack, u select 2 cards in your opponents hand (without turning them over to see what they are) and bind them for the duration of the attack. The bind is temporary, lasting only for that attack, but can provide some advantage. Though it does not say so as part of the effect, your opponent can't move the position of cards in their hand during your turn. Scenario: Opponent has 6 cards in their hand. 2 perfects, 2 5k guards, and 2 10k guards. Normaly the 1st rear would attack and get stopped by a 10k. perfect guard vg, 15k or perfect the last attack. With this, u get a chance to bind the 2 10k's forcing a hit or opponent using more cards to guard than necessary. If u kept an eye on where your opponent places their cards after drive checks, u can use it to bind specific cards u don't want them to guard with. Even if u don't bind the correct cards, odds are your opponent will need 5 cards to stop your attacks. When that last attack comes, they will have 3 cards in hand and need at least 2. Bind 2 and they will be 1 card short. My original idea was to permanently bind but perma-binding for each attack is a bit OP if luck is on your side with stand triggers. Doing it with VG only, not only ruins the synergy with stands, but doesn't work with Zeal. This powers up the VG for it's DP special and gives it the chance to land that powerful strike while allowing Zeal and his rears to finish off a weakened enemy VG. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Swordy Arty Onliney"
by
gerloche
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
WS uses a 50 card deck. No more, no less. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Sword Art Online's Magic"
by
mattievangaurd
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
WS uses a 50 card deck. No more, no less. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "SAO Lisbeth + Silica"
by
heromapling
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
WS uses a 50 card deck. No more, no less. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Kirito x Asuna"
by
rainlyl
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
WS uses a 50 card deck. No more, no less. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Flames"
by
j3ways
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
How do u plan on using those light and water cards? U have 3 light and at least 1 needs o be in the mana zone. If your game plan relies entirely (or at the least heavily) on luck, u need another game plan. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Terra Force"
by
cbox
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! did not see the do not rate. I usually read these things. My mind was not working right. If I could take it back I would. It is a great deck though. Again, Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! Sorry! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "burst the bursters"
by
rony98j
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
Here at TCO if u build a deck using illegal cards, u should warn the other players b4 u challenge them. TCO has monthly tournaments and illegal cards are not allowed in tournaments. If your opponent is fine with it, then it's fine. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Final Dragon"
by
dragon7
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
The SuperStarDragon Yamatowurm-Nova is useless in this deck. 2 of the effects need bursts.There r spirits with rage that are a better fit. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Eradicators"
by
sharaizzy
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
I'll rate when the deck is legal. Go here http://www.tradecardsonline.com/media/rules/VG_playbook_6_5.pdf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Royal Stuff"
by
celtin
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
when your deck is legal, I might rate then. http://www.tradecardsonline.com/media/rules/VG_playbook_6_5.pdf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "lord of flame"
by
atominw
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
It's 1 thing to be inspired by another player's deck, it's another to copy it card for card. U seriously think I wouldn't notice u copied my 'Hero Dragons' deck? | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Shiroh's Red"
by
kiryushiroh
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
Fried is limited to 1. If your gonna use more than 1 u have to let people know. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Purple/Green Brave Version 2"
by
raikaze17
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
http://battle-spirits.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Ken_Haneyuki/Battle_Spirits_Banned_and_Restricted_Cards TCO does a monthly tournament. Edit the deck to fit the ban list or warn people before u challenge them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Kuro no Comeback"
by
kurokawa
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
Yamato-Fried is limited to one | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Subete watashi no kami o hakai"
by
wolfbriar
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
Amaterasu is an illegal/banned card. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "In The End"
by
hellkizer
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
This is Kaijudo not Duel Masters; the rules are a bit different. No more than 3 copies. Go to http://www.kaijudo.com/faq/ then rebuild the deck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Darkness Rises"
by
kickb45
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
I haven't played in years but, are special energy cards not limited to 4? | |
| Back to top |
|
|
|
In the discussion on the
Deck "Eternal Light"
by
crusader13
|
|
|
jcthundar
|
Your deck is breaking the 3 copy rule. No more than 3 copies per card. That includes reprints. If the name is the same, it counts as the same card no matter the image. | |
| Back to top |
|
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 Next | ||




In the discussion on the
In the discussion on the
In the discussion on the
In the discussion on the
In the discussion on the



